This chart compares S&P 500 performance 6 months before and 12 months after the first Fed rate cut for several years: 1995, 1998, 2001, 2007, and 2019. The chart distinguishes between rate cuts of 0.25% (red lines) and 0.50% (blue lines), providing insight into how the stock market reacted under different conditions. Here are the key observations and analysis:

Key Observations:

1. Performance Before the First Rate Cut (T = 0):
   • 1995 & 1998 (Red Lines): Before the 0.25% rate cuts, the S&P 500 generally increased or remained stable, reflecting strong market sentiment leading up to the cuts.
   • 2001, 2007 & 2019 (Blue Lines): Before the 0.50% cuts, the S&P 500 had more volatile or declining trends, signaling market weakness and anticipation of a more aggressive policy response.
2. Performance After the First Rate Cut:
   • 1995 & 1998 (0.25% Cuts): After the first 0.25% rate cut, the market continued to trend upward, reflecting positive market sentiment and suggesting that modest rate cuts helped maintain the bull market during these periods.
     • 1998 saw particularly strong market performance following the cut, with the S&P 500 continuing to climb steadily throughout the 12-month period after the cut.
   • 2001 & 2007 (0.50% Cuts): These periods saw sharp declines after the first cut, particularly around 8 months following the cut. This reflects that more aggressive 0.50% rate cuts were likely made in response to underlying economic weakness, which failed to prevent a further downturn.
     • 2001 and 2007 both correspond to the dot-com bubble and the Global Financial Crisis, respectively, where markets entered prolonged bear markets despite the Fed’s attempts to ease monetary conditions.
   • 2019 (0.25% Cut): Similar to 1995 and 1998, the market reacted positively after the 0.25% cut, and the S&P 500 rallied strongly over the following year. This suggests that the modest rate cut was sufficient to reassure markets and boost confidence, especially since the cut came in response to a softening global economy and trade tensions, rather than a financial crisis.

General Patterns:

• Modest Rate Cuts (0.25%): When the Fed made smaller 0.25% cuts (1995, 1998, and 2019), the market generally responded positively. These cuts were likely made during periods of economic resilience, where the Fed sought to support ongoing growth, and market sentiment remained optimistic. The market tended to rally significantly in the 12 months following these cuts.
• Aggressive Rate Cuts (0.50%): The 0.50% rate cuts in 2001 and 2007 reflect more dire economic conditions. The larger cuts were likely in response to deeper economic issues such as the dot-com bubble burst and the subprime mortgage crisis. In both cases, the market continued to decline after the rate cuts, showing that aggressive cuts alone were not enough to prevent significant downturns.

Analysis of Market Sentiment:

• Positive Reactions to Modest Cuts: The strong post-cut performance in 1995, 1998, and 2019 suggests that investor confidence remained high, and the cuts served to stabilize markets and reinforce the perception of ongoing growth.
• Negative Reactions to Larger Cuts: The post-cut declines in 2001 and 2007 show that larger cuts were perceived as signs of deeper economic trouble, leading to continued market volatility. The Fed’s larger cuts in these periods were unable to prevent the recessions and further stock market losses.

Conclusion:

The S&P 500’s performance following a Fed rate cut is highly dependent on the underlying economic conditions at the time of the cut. Modest cuts (0.25%) have historically been associated with positive stock market performance, suggesting that they are effective when used preemptively or in times of mild economic slowdown. More aggressive cuts (0.50%), on the other hand, have historically occurred in response to crises, and the market has reacted poorly in these cases, signaling deeper economic issues that rate cuts alone could not resolve.

Follow me on social media: https://linktr.ee/realchartchamp